Wednesday, May 29, 2019

The Human Brain :: essays research papers fc

The Human BrainThrough the use of molecular biology it is thought that the hominidae family first appe bed about 5 million age ago. Based on this time frame it is believed that an African Hominoid lineage was present shortly before that time, approximately 10 myp, which contained the common ancestor to both the chimp and human. The split into proto-chimpanzee and proto-human occurred during the last million years of the Miocene epoch. (Changeux and Chavaillon pg. 61). The fossils, especially those of the skull, from this time frame are limited. This leads to difficulty in proving differences in adept formation. Fossils of the hominoid cranium are not available until 2 million years after the proto-human lineage begins. The lack of cranial fossils for 2 million years is a problem. We do not cope what took place during this time. The first available cranial fossils are those of A. afarensis. The mean endo cranial skill was 413.5 cm3, which means that its brain size was that of to days African cracking apes (Changeux and Chavaillon pg. 65, table 4.1). With the limited fossils available and the apparent brain size of todays African great apes there is no proof of significant differences in brain functionality. One study done by Ralph Holloway on the endocaste of the Hadar AL 162-68 skull fragment lead to a different theory regarding significant differences in brain functionality. Hadar concluded that the lunate sulcus would have had to be, according to the position of the interparietal sulcus, in a more posterior position than in Pan brains. This means that A. afarensis had an expansion of the parietal association cortex and consequently a brain reorganization (Changeux and Chavaillon pg.106). Brain reorganization implies that A. afarensis had a significant difference in brain functionality. The cranial capacity of A. africanus has a mean of 440 cm3, A. robustus a mean capacity of 530 cm3 and A. boisei a mean capacity of 463.3 (Changeux and Chavaillon pg.65, table 4.1). When the limited sample size is taken into account, is there a significant difference? The modern human inter-racial mean is of the order of 1350 cm3, which is 3.52 times that of the chimpanzee, 2.68 times that of the gorilla value, and 3.33 times the orang-utan value, the comparative inter-hominoid index values for Australopithecus species are seen to have hardly increased at all (Changeux and Chavaillon pg. 67). If we compare the modern chimpanzee, as modern humans closest living ancestor, to the australopithecines we find that they plant a small but definite advance over the chimpanzee in both absolute and relative brain size (Changeux and Chavaillon pg.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.